Predictive Mineralogy
Possible unrecorded species at Dzheltul'skii massif (Dzhaltul), Kureika river, Taymyrsky Dolgano-Nenetsky District, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia
This table is based on statistical analysis of other localities containing similar species to the ones found at this locality.
| Possible missing species | Formula | Match % | Due to recorded presence of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pyrite | FeS2 | 99.99% | Acanthite (68.82 %), Altaite (80.20 %), Atokite (57.69 %), Bornite (70.77 %), Breithauptite (74.75 %), Calcite (51.16 %), Chalcocite (65.95 %), Chalcopyrite (75.16 %), Cubanite (82.18 %), Dolomite (58.22 %), Froodite (68.42 %), Galena (66.84 %), Hematite (50.17 %), Kotulskite (62.87 %), Maucherite (61.05 %), Merenskyite (68.37 %), Michenerite (68.83 %), Moncheite (67.22 %), Mooihoekite (62.96 %), Nickeline (66.71 %), Palarstanide (52.38 %), Pentlandite (58.72 %), Putoranite (62.50 %), Silver (54.72 %), Sobolevskite (58.57 %), Sperrylite (56.52 %), Sphalerite (75.10 %), Sudburyite (63.49 %), Talnakhite (64.44 %), Telargpalite (62.07 %) |
| Pyrrhotite | Fe1-xS | 99.99% | Altaite (53.19 %), Atokite (75.00 %), Breithauptite (67.33 %), Cabriite (58.82 %), Cubanite (81.53 %), Froodite (86.84 %), Haycockite (53.33 %), Kotulskite (70.06 %), Maucherite (55.26 %), Merenskyite (73.47 %), Michenerite (85.71 %), Moncheite (78.33 %), Mooihoekite (66.67 %), Palarstanide (66.67 %), Pentlandite (74.78 %), Putoranite (50.00 %), Rustenburgite (64.15 %), Sobolevskite (62.86 %), Sperrylite (61.33 %), Sudburyite (79.37 %), Talnakhite (71.11 %), Telargpalite (75.86 %), Zvyagintsevite (65.38 %) |
| Gold | Au | 99.99% | Altaite (79.21 %), Atokite (61.54 %), Froodite (68.42 %), Kotulskite (59.88 %), Merenskyite (58.16 %), Michenerite (61.69 %), Moncheite (54.44 %), Palarstanide (57.14 %), Rustenburgite (54.72 %), Sobolevskite (50.00 %), Sperrylite (53.09 %), Sudburyite (66.67 %), Telargpalite (55.17 %), Tetra-auricupride (72.50 %), Tulameenite (52.86 %), Zvyagintsevite (55.77 %) |
| Braggite | PdPt3S4 | 99.01% | Atokite (57.69 %), Palarstanide (71.43 %), Rustenburgite (62.26 %), Telargpalite (55.17 %), Zvyagintsevite (51.92 %) |
| Millerite | NiS | 93.48% | Heazlewoodite (52.99 %), Orcelite (63.04 %), Putoranite (62.50 %) |
| Hessite | Ag2Te | 93.21% | Altaite (59.57 %), Froodite (51.32 %), Telargpalite (65.52 %) |
| Chromite | Fe2+Cr3+2O4 | 79.99% | Awaruite (57.00 %), Cabriite (58.82 %), Heazlewoodite (61.75 %), Iron (51.19 %), Isocubanite (80.00 %), Orcelite (69.57 %), Putoranite (62.50 %), Rustenburgite (56.60 %), Taenite (62.40 %), Troilite (60.27 %), Tulameenite (55.71 %), Wairauite (63.16 %) |
| Hollingworthite | (Rh,Pt,Pd)AsS | 78.31% | Atokite (53.85 %), Palarstanide (57.14 %), Telargpalite (51.72 %), Tulameenite (50.00 %), Zvyagintsevite (55.77 %) |
| Laurite | RuS2 | 74.78% | Orcelite (50.00 %), Rustenburgite (58.49 %), Tulameenite (68.57 %) |
| Schreibersite | (Fe,Ni)3P | 63.21% | Cohenite (63.22 %) |
| Isoferroplatinum | Pt3Fe | 62.85% | Tulameenite (62.86 %) |
| Vysotskite | PdS | 62.06% | Telargpalite (62.07 %) |
| Arsenopyrite | FeAsS | 60.89% | Breithauptite (60.89 %) |
| Sopcheite | Ag4Pd3Te4 | 58.62% | Telargpalite (58.62 %) |
| Malachite | Cu2(CO3)(OH)2 | 56.19% | Chalcocite (56.20 %) |
| Cooperite | PtS | 54.71% | Rustenburgite (54.72 %) |
| Valleriite | (Fe2+,Cu)4(Mg,Al)3S4(OH,O)6 | 52.94% | Cabriite (52.94 %) |
| Muscovite | KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2 | 52.79% | Albite (52.80 %) |
| Paolovite | Pd2Sn | 51.72% | Telargpalite (51.72 %) |
| Titanite | CaTi(SiO4)O | 50.85% | Hastingsite (50.85 %) |
| Gersdorffite | NiAsS | 50.79% | Sudburyite (50.79 %) |
| Godlevskite | (Ni,Fe)9S8 | 50.00% | Putoranite (50.00 %) |
| Tetraferroplatinum | PtFe | 50.00% | Tulameenite (50.00 %) |
| Irarsite | (Ir,Ru,Rh,Pt)AsS | 45.71% | Tulameenite (57.14 %) |
| Osmium | (Os,Ir,Ru) | 42.28% | Tulameenite (52.86 %) |
Key: Mineral matches key element mineralogy of deposit Key element(s) in mineral not listed for deposit (-20% score)
Predicting paragenetic modes of deposit
Green indicates almost certain match based on minerals unique to a certain deposit type. Yellow indicates a possibly poor match, but should not be entirely discounted. Scores > 100 indicate strong confidence.