Predictive Mineralogy
Possible unrecorded species at Dzhaltul Mount, Dzheltul'skii massif (Dzhaltul), Kureika river, Taymyrsky Dolgano-Nenetsky District, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia
This table is based on statistical analysis of other localities containing similar species to the ones found at this locality.
| Possible missing species | Formula | Match % | Due to recorded presence of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pyrrhotite | Fe1-xS | 99.99% | Altaite (53.19 %), Atokite (75.00 %), Cubanite (81.53 %), Froodite (86.84 %), Haycockite (53.33 %), Kotulskite (70.06 %), Merenskyite (73.47 %), Michenerite (85.71 %), Moncheite (78.33 %), Mooihoekite (66.67 %), Palarstanide (66.67 %), Pentlandite (74.78 %), Putoranite (50.00 %), Rustenburgite (64.15 %), Sobolevskite (62.86 %), Sperrylite (61.33 %), Talnakhite (71.11 %), Telargpalite (75.86 %), Zvyagintsevite (65.38 %) |
| Pyrite | FeS2 | 99.99% | Altaite (80.20 %), Atokite (57.69 %), Calcite (51.16 %), Chalcopyrite (75.16 %), Cubanite (82.18 %), Dolomite (58.22 %), Froodite (68.42 %), Hematite (50.17 %), Kotulskite (62.87 %), Merenskyite (68.37 %), Michenerite (68.83 %), Moncheite (67.22 %), Mooihoekite (62.96 %), Palarstanide (52.38 %), Pentlandite (58.72 %), Putoranite (62.50 %), Silver (54.72 %), Sobolevskite (58.57 %), Sperrylite (56.52 %), Talnakhite (64.44 %), Telargpalite (62.07 %) |
| Bornite | Cu5FeS4 | 99.90% | Froodite (52.63 %), Haycockite (53.33 %), Mooihoekite (55.56 %), Palarstanide (52.38 %), Putoranite (50.00 %), Sobolevskite (50.00 %), Talnakhite (57.78 %), Telargpalite (58.62 %), Zvyagintsevite (51.92 %) |
| Galena | PbS | 99.89% | Altaite (73.81 %), Chalcopyrite (51.07 %), Cubanite (63.07 %), Froodite (60.53 %), Michenerite (51.30 %), Mooihoekite (51.85 %), Silver (52.62 %), Talnakhite (51.11 %) |
| Braggite | PdPt3S4 | 99.01% | Atokite (57.69 %), Palarstanide (71.43 %), Rustenburgite (62.26 %), Telargpalite (55.17 %), Zvyagintsevite (51.92 %) |
| Iron | Fe | 94.64% | Isocubanite (79.02 %), Troilite (74.49 %) |
| Hessite | Ag2Te | 93.21% | Altaite (59.57 %), Froodite (51.32 %), Telargpalite (65.52 %) |
| Taenite | (Fe,Ni) | 87.32% | Isocubanite (71.71 %), Troilite (55.20 %) |
| Gold | Au | 79.99% | Altaite (79.21 %), Atokite (61.54 %), Froodite (68.42 %), Kotulskite (59.88 %), Merenskyite (58.16 %), Michenerite (61.69 %), Moncheite (54.44 %), Palarstanide (57.14 %), Rustenburgite (54.72 %), Sobolevskite (50.00 %), Sperrylite (53.09 %), Telargpalite (55.17 %), Tulameenite (52.86 %), Zvyagintsevite (55.77 %) |
| Sphalerite | ZnS | 79.97% | Altaite (68.58 %), Chalcopyrite (50.66 %), Cubanite (76.46 %), Froodite (59.21 %), Haycockite (53.33 %), Michenerite (51.95 %), Mooihoekite (55.56 %), Talnakhite (55.56 %), Telargpalite (55.17 %) |
| Chromite | Fe2+Cr3+2O4 | 79.54% | Isocubanite (80.00 %), Putoranite (62.50 %), Rustenburgite (56.60 %), Troilite (60.27 %), Tulameenite (55.71 %) |
| Hollingworthite | (Rh,Pt,Pd)AsS | 78.31% | Atokite (53.85 %), Palarstanide (57.14 %), Telargpalite (51.72 %), Tulameenite (50.00 %), Zvyagintsevite (55.77 %) |
| Ilmenite | Fe2+TiO3 | 73.22% | Froodite (61.84 %), Isocubanite (55.61 %), Putoranite (50.00 %) |
| Laurite | RuS2 | 69.56% | Rustenburgite (58.49 %), Tulameenite (68.57 %) |
| Isoferroplatinum | Pt3Fe | 62.85% | Tulameenite (62.86 %) |
| Millerite | NiS | 62.50% | Putoranite (62.50 %) |
| Vysotskite | PdS | 62.06% | Telargpalite (62.07 %) |
| Sopcheite | Ag4Pd3Te4 | 58.62% | Telargpalite (58.62 %) |
| Copper | Cu | 57.07% | Isocubanite (57.07 %) |
| Cooperite | PtS | 54.71% | Rustenburgite (54.72 %) |
| Paolovite | Pd2Sn | 51.72% | Telargpalite (51.72 %) |
| Godlevskite | (Ni,Fe)9S8 | 50.00% | Putoranite (50.00 %) |
| Heazlewoodite | Ni3S2 | 50.00% | Putoranite (50.00 %) |
| Tetraferroplatinum | PtFe | 50.00% | Tulameenite (50.00 %) |
| Irarsite | (Ir,Ru,Rh,Pt)AsS | 45.71% | Tulameenite (57.14 %) |
| Osmium | (Os,Ir,Ru) | 42.28% | Tulameenite (52.86 %) |
Key: Mineral matches key element mineralogy of deposit Key element(s) in mineral not listed for deposit (-20% score)
Predicting paragenetic modes of deposit
Green indicates almost certain match based on minerals unique to a certain deposit type. Yellow indicates a possibly poor match, but should not be entirely discounted. Scores > 100 indicate strong confidence.