This table is based on statistical analysis of other localities containing similar species to the ones found at this locality.
Possible missing species | Formula | Match % | Due to recorded presence of |
---|
Quartz | SiO2 | 99.99% | Aeschynite-(Ce) (57.69 %), Calcite (62.43 %), Davidite-(Ce) (83.33 %), Dolomite (62.52 %), Fergusonite-(Ce) (66.67 %), Fergusonite-(Y) (76.06 %), Magnetite (50.54 %), Monazite-(Ce) (77.02 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (57.14 %) |
Pyrite | FeS2 | 99.78% | Calcite (51.16 %), Davidite-(Ce) (83.33 %), Dolomite (58.22 %), Fergusonite-(Ce) (80.95 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (66.67 %) |
Albite | Na(AlSi3O8) | 99.74% | Aeschynite-(Ce) (63.46 %), Davidite-(Ce) (66.67 %), Fergusonite-(Ce) (76.19 %), Fergusonite-(Y) (57.75 %), Monazite-(Ce) (51.78 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (57.14 %) |
Muscovite | KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2 | 96.68% | Davidite-(Ce) (66.67 %), Fergusonite-(Ce) (52.38 %), Monazite-(Ce) (51.26 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (57.14 %) |
Titanite | CaTi(SiO4)O | 96.03% | Aeschynite-(Ce) (50.00 %), Fergusonite-(Ce) (76.19 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (66.67 %) |
Rutile | TiO2 | 91.75% | Aeschynite-(Ce) (59.62 %), Fergusonite-(Ce) (52.38 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (57.14 %) |
Diopside | CaMgSi2O6 | 89.86% | Clinohumite (64.54 %), Fergusonite-(Ce) (71.43 %) |
Ilmenite | Fe2+TiO3 | 88.88% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (66.67 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (66.67 %) |
Allanite-(Ce) | (CaCe)(AlAlFe2+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH) | 87.30% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (66.67 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (61.90 %) |
Pyrrhotite | Fe1-xS | 85.71% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (66.67 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (57.14 %) |
Fluorapatite | Ca5(PO4)3F | 83.67% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (61.90 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (57.14 %) |
Thorite | Th(SiO4) | 81.85% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (61.90 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (52.38 %) |
Zircon | Zr(SiO4) | 79.98% | Aeschynite-(Ce) (63.46 %), Davidite-(Ce) (66.67 %), Fergusonite-(Ce) (90.48 %), Fergusonite-(Y) (69.95 %), Monazite-(Ce) (54.99 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (76.19 %), Thorianite (52.80 %) |
Fersmite | (Ca,Ce,Na)(Nb,Ta,Ti)2(O,OH,F)6 | 77.32% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (52.38 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (52.38 %) |
Baryte | BaSO4 | 66.93% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (61.90 %), Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (57.14 %) |
Fluorite | CaF2 | 66.66% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (66.67 %) |
Chevkinite-(Ce) | Ce4(Ti,Fe2+,Fe3+)5O8(Si2O7)2 | 66.66% | Nioboaeschynite-(Ce) (66.67 %) |
Aegirine | NaFe3+Si2O6 | 57.14% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (57.14 %) |
Hematite | Fe2O3 | 57.14% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (57.14 %) |
Microcline | K(AlSi3O8) | 53.52% | Fergusonite-(Y) (53.52 %) |
Molybdenite | MoS2 | 53.33% | Davidite-(Ce) (66.67 %) |
Nepheline | Na3K(Al4Si4O16) | 52.38% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (52.38 %) |
Chalcopyrite | CuFeS2 | 41.90% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (52.38 %) |
Sphalerite | ZnS | 41.90% | Fergusonite-(Ce) (52.38 %) |
Green indicates almost certain match based on minerals unique to a certain deposit type. Yellow indicates a possibly poor match, but should not be entirely discounted. Scores > 100 indicate strong confidence.