登录注册
Quick Links : Mindat手册The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
主页关于 MindatMindat手册Mindat的历史版权Who We Are联系我们于 Mindat.org刊登广告
捐赠给 MindatCorporate Sponsorship赞助板页已赞助的板页在 Mindat刊登 广告的广告商于 Mindat.org刊登广告
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
搜索矿物的性质搜索矿物的化学Advanced Locality Search随意显示任何一 种矿物Random Locality使用minID搜索邻近产地Search Articles搜索词汇表更多搜索选项
搜索:
矿物名称:
地区产地名称:
关键字:
 
Mindat手册添加新照片Rate Photos产区编辑报告Coordinate Completion Report添加词汇表项目
Mining Companies统计会员列表Mineral MuseumsClubs & Organizations矿物展及活动The Mindat目录表设备设置The Mineral Quiz
照片搜索Photo GalleriesSearch by Color今天最新的照片昨天最新的照片用户照片相集过去每日精选照片相集Photography

Mt. Eielson prospects (Copper Mountain prospects), Kantishna Mining District, Denali Borough, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
Mt. Eielson prospects (Copper Mountain prospects)Group of Prospects
Kantishna Mining DistrictMining District
Denali BoroughBorough
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
63° 18' 41'' North , 150° 31' 26'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Group of Prospects
Köppen climate type:
Mindat Locality ID:
199030
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:199030:3
GUID (UUID V4):
ff101089-f189-4c09-b321-19b375652f4b


The peak known as Mt. Eielson was originally called Copper Mountain. The area is entirely in Denali Park and Preserve. It was originally in Mount McKinley National Park . At the time of the mineral discovery in 1920 until the 1970s, claim location and mining were legal in the National Park. There has been no substantial work in the area since the 1940s. In general, all of the mineral occurrences on the north flank of Mt. McKinley historically have constituted the Kantishna district. Reed (1933) and others, however, segregated the intensely mineralized area near Mt. Eielson as the Mt. Eielson or Copper Mountain district.
Location: The Mount Eielson or Copper Mountain district (Reed, 1933; Gates and Wahrhaftig, 1944; Muir, Thomas, and Sanford, 1948; Cobb, 1980 [OFR 80-363]) contains numerous zinc-lead replacement deposits. The main group of deposits is on the north flank of Mt. Eielson and extends easterly for at least four miles from Glacier Creek on the east side of Muldrow Glacier to Bald Mountain south of Sunrise Creek. For this record, the site is at the approximate center of a group of nineteen claims which were actively explored in about 1922 to 1924. The site also is at the approximate center of the most intensely mineralized area identified in the district. The main part of the district is covered by locations 37-40 of Cobb (1972 [MF 366]) and by location 46 of MacKevett and Holloway (1977).
Geology: The country rocks in the Mt. Eielson district are probably Paleozoic (Devonian?) and consist of limestone, calcareous argillite, slate, and schist. These rocks are cut by gabbro and locally overlain(?) by Triassic(?) greenstone. Tertiary coal-bearing rocks and Nenana Gravel form a local basin that probably underlies much of the alluvium-filled valley of Thorofare Creek on the north side of the district (Reed, 1933, plate 24). The mineral deposits are largely hosted by the limestone and calcareous argillite. The pre-coal-bearing rocks are intruded by granodiorite and porphyritic granodiorite (Reed, 1933). The granodiorite mass near Mt. Eielson is approximately on strike with the east-northeasterly-elongated McGonagall granodiorite batholith (Reed, 1961), and is probably related to it (Decker and Gilbert, 1978; Cole, 1998). The McGonagall granodiorite is north of the Denali fault. It is equivalent to the Foraker granodiorite that is exposed south of the fault. Reed (1933) considered the granodiorite at Mt. Eielson to be Jurassic, but it is now known to be Late Eocene or Early Oligocene (Reed and Lanphere, 1973, 1974; Decker and Gilbert, 1978; Cole, 1998). The mineralization in the district is closely associated with the granodiorite and porphyritic granodiorite; it probably formed in Oligocene time, during the waning stages of McGonagall plutonism. The granodiorite is greenish-gray and contains abundant phenocrysts of oligoclase-andesine and fewer of hornblende. K-feldspar veins and locally replaces plagioclase. The porphyritic granodiorite is more variable; some is relatively free of phenocrysts, and some contains large feldspar and hornblende phenocrysts as much as 1.5 inches long (Reed, 1933, p. 257-58). The hornblende is extensively altered to chlorite, and secondary epidote, sphene, calcite, and sericite occur widely in the rock. Locally the granodiorite contains pyrite and pyrrhotite; this rock weathers to dark rusty brown limonite. The main granitic mass on Mt. Eielson is even-grained granodiorite that grades upward into porphyritic granodiorite that forms many sill-like and dike-like apophyses in the calcic country rocks. The calcic strata generally dip northerly at a low angle. Reed (1933, plates 22, 23, 24 and figures 35 and 36) shows that the major structure in the district is a steeply-dipping fault that strikes east and is exposed about 1/2 mile south of Mt. Eielson. Rocks north of the fault are uplifted vertically. The mineral deposits are in stratiform, epidotized and silicified layers that formed by replacing favorable calcic argillite and limestone beds. The ore minerals replace the epidote-silica rock. The deposits occur in a belt at least four miles long which can be traced eastward from Muldrow Glacier to Bald Mountain. The ore is banded. According to Reed (1933, p. 273), sulfide-rich bands 1/16th to 1 inch thick alternate with bands of epidote-silica rock. The most abundant gangue minerals are members of the epidote group, dominantly clinozoisite. Garnet occurs rarely; quartz and calcite are minor gangue minerals. Quartz occurs most commonly as a fine-grained replacement product, but occasionally forms veins. Locally, layers as much as 40 feet thick are mineralized. Because of glacial cover, tracing the individual mineralized beds is difficult, but some appear to be continuous for distances of hundreds of feet. Sphalerite, mainly fine-grained, is the most abundant ore mineral, followed by coarsely crystalline galena. Chalcopyrite is less abundant but may increase in content near the contact with the underlying massive granodiorite. The chalcopyrite is paragentically younger than the sphalerite and galena. Pyrite is common, and pyrite and pyrrhotite occur as disseminations in the granodiorite. Pyrargyrite was tentatively identified microscopically in the galena. Scattered high-silver values occur in the pyrargyrite-bearing lodes and in some galena-rich lodes, but silver content is generally less than three ounces per ton. Gold is not detected in most samples, but a few assays show 0.02-3 ounces per ton. Azurite and malachite and rare native copper are oxidation products of chalcopyrite and probably rare tetrahedrite. Metallurgical studies by the U. S. Bureau of mines identified the oxidized lead and zinc minerals cerussite and smithsonite in the near-surface ore (Muir, Thomas, and Sanford, 1947). The Bureau's studies were carried out in cooperation with detailed field mapping by the U. S. Geological Survey (Gates and Wahrhaftig, 1944). Nickel, in garnierite, millerite, and possibly pentlandite also occurs in the district. Samples containing these minerals were submitted to the Territorial Department of Mines by F. B. Jiles in 1924 and 1926 and by W. J. Shannon in 1929 (Joesting, 1941-43, p. 18-19). The minerals probably occur in contact-metamorphosed magnesian carbonate rocks.
Workings: The district was discovered in 1920 by Joe and Fannie Quigley. More deposits were found in 1921 by O. M. Grant and others. The area was actively explored from 1921 to 1924; some prospecting continued into the 1940s. The area was explored by W. E. Dunkle in 1923 for Kennecott Copper Corporation (Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, February 23, 1923.) Dunkle's miners drove at least one adit about 100 foot long; there are at least two other short adits and many prospect pits. Because of the extent of the mineralized area, it was of substantial interest to government agencies, whose investigations began soon after discovery with the work of Davis (1923). Other early government investigations included those by Capps (1927), Moffit (1933), and Reed's definitive study (1933). World War II triggered investigations by the U. S. Geological Survey (Gates and Wahrhaftig, 1944) and U. S. Bureau of Mines (Muir, Thomas, and Sanford, 1947). The area was briefly studied by Chadwick (1975) on behalf of the U. S. Park Service. Earlier studies were summarized by Berg and Cobb (1967). Hawley and Associates (1978) also summarized earlier studies in an investigation related to Alaska National Interest Lands. Muir, Thomas, and Sanford (1947) reported poor recovery of lead and zinc in flotation tests. At least part of the poor recovery was due to the partly oxidized sample material available for test work. Chadwick (1975) proposed that there is about 100,000 tons of material in talus that might support a small custom mill. Earlier estimates of resources had been made by Reed (1933), Gates and Wahrhaftig (1944), and Twenhofel (1953).
Age: The mineralization is mid-Tertiary, roughly contemporaneous with the Eocene or Oligocene emplacement age of the granodiorite (Reed and Lanphere, 1973, 1974; Decker and Gilbert, 1978; Cole, 1998).
Alteration: Introduction of epidote-group minerals and silicification of calcic argillite. Granodiorite is propylitized; the hornblende has been chloritized. Sericite is locally present in the granodiorite. Locally conspicuous surface oxidation of iron-, copper-, lead-, and zinc-bearing minerals.
Reserves: There are no measured reserves. Reed (1933) estimated a resource of many hundreds of thousands of tons of ore containing about 10 percent combined lead and zinc. Gates and Wahrhaftig (1944) estimated 200,000 tons of ore in place and in talus. Twenhofel (1953) estimated a similar tonnage grading about 5 percent zinc, 3 to 5 percent lead, and 0.2 to 0.3 percent copper. Chadwick (1975) estimated that there was about 100,000 tons of material in talus containing about 10 percent combined lead and zinc, and suggested that this material and other outcropping high-grade ore might support a small concentrating mill.

Commodities (Major) - Pb, Zn; (Minor) - Ag, Au, Cu, Ni
Development Status: No
Deposit Model: Polymetallic replacement deposits; Zn-Pb-(Cu) skarn deposits (Cox and Singer, 1

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


17 valid minerals.

Detailed Mineral List:

Azurite
Formula: Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2
Calcite
Formula: CaCO3
Cerussite
Formula: PbCO3
Chalcopyrite
Formula: CuFeS2
Clinozoisite
Formula: (CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Copper
Formula: Cu
Epidote
Formula: (CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Galena
Formula: PbS
'Garnet Group'
Formula: X3Z2(SiO4)3
'Garnierite'
'Limonite'
Malachite
Formula: Cu2(CO3)(OH)2
Millerite
Formula: NiS
Pentlandite
Formula: (NixFey)Σ9S8
Pyrargyrite
Formula: Ag3SbS3
Pyrite
Formula: FeS2
Pyrrhotite
Formula: Fe1-xS
Quartz
Formula: SiO2
Smithsonite
Formula: ZnCO3
'Tetrahedrite Subgroup'
Formula: Cu6(Cu4C2+2)Sb4S12S
Zoisite
Formula: (CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 1 - Elements
Copper1.AA.05Cu
Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Pentlandite2.BB.15(NixFey)Σ9S8
Chalcopyrite2.CB.10aCuFeS2
Pyrrhotite2.CC.10Fe1-xS
Millerite2.CC.20NiS
Galena2.CD.10PbS
Pyrite2.EB.05aFeS2
Pyrargyrite2.GA.05Ag3SbS3
'Tetrahedrite Subgroup'2.GB.05Cu6(Cu4C2+2)Sb4S12S
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Quartz4.DA.05SiO2
Group 5 - Nitrates and Carbonates
Smithsonite5.AB.05ZnCO3
Calcite5.AB.05CaCO3
Cerussite5.AB.15PbCO3
Azurite5.BA.05Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2
Malachite5.BA.10Cu2(CO3)(OH)2
Group 9 - Silicates
Epidote9.BG.05a(CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Clinozoisite9.BG.05a(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Zoisite9.BG.10(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Unclassified
'Limonite'-
'Garnet Group'-X3Z2(SiO4)3
'Garnierite'-

List of minerals for each chemical element

HHydrogen
H AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
H Clinozoisite(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
H Epidote(CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
H MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
H Zoisite(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
CCarbon
C AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
C CalciteCaCO3
C CerussitePbCO3
C MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
C SmithsoniteZnCO3
OOxygen
O AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
O CalciteCaCO3
O CerussitePbCO3
O Clinozoisite(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
O Epidote(CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
O MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
O QuartzSiO2
O SmithsoniteZnCO3
O Zoisite(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
O Garnet GroupX3Z2(SiO4)3
AlAluminium
Al Clinozoisite(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Al Epidote(CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Al Zoisite(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
SiSilicon
Si Clinozoisite(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Si Epidote(CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Si QuartzSiO2
Si Zoisite(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Si Garnet GroupX3Z2(SiO4)3
SSulfur
S ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
S GalenaPbS
S MilleriteNiS
S Pentlandite(NixFey)Σ9S8
S PyrargyriteAg3SbS3
S PyriteFeS2
S PyrrhotiteFe1-xS
S Tetrahedrite SubgroupCu6(Cu4C22+)Sb4S12S
CaCalcium
Ca CalciteCaCO3
Ca Clinozoisite(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Ca Epidote(CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Ca Zoisite(CaCa)(AlAlAl)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
FeIron
Fe ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Fe Epidote(CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)
Fe Pentlandite(NixFey)Σ9S8
Fe PyriteFeS2
Fe PyrrhotiteFe1-xS
NiNickel
Ni MilleriteNiS
Ni Pentlandite(NixFey)Σ9S8
CuCopper
Cu AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
Cu ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Cu CopperCu
Cu MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
Cu Tetrahedrite SubgroupCu6(Cu4C22+)Sb4S12S
ZnZinc
Zn SmithsoniteZnCO3
AgSilver
Ag PyrargyriteAg3SbS3
SbAntimony
Sb PyrargyriteAg3SbS3
Sb Tetrahedrite SubgroupCu6(Cu4C22+)Sb4S12S
PbLead
Pb CerussitePbCO3
Pb GalenaPbS

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:MM166

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality


This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

Berg, H.C., and Cobb, E.H., 1967, Metalliferous lode deposits of Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1246, 254 p. Capps, S.R., 1927, The Toklat-Tonzona River region: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 792-C, p. 73-110. Chadwick, R. H. W., 1975, Gross mineral appraisal of Mt. McKinley National Park, Katmai National Monument, proposed Lake Clark National Park: Unpublished report, National Park Service, Alaska. Cobb, E. H., 1972, Metallic mineral resources map of the Mount McKinley quadrangle, Alaska: U. S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-366, 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Cobb, E.H., 1980, Summary of references to mineral occurrences (other than mineral fuels and construction materials) in the Mount McKinley quadrangle, Alaska: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 80-363, 150 p. Cole, R. B., 1998, Early Tertiary post-subduction volcanism and deformation along the north side of the McKinley fault, Alaska [abs]: Geological Society of America. Abstracts with program, v. 30, p. 177. Cox, D.P., and Singer, D.A., eds., 1986, Mineral deposit models: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1693, 379 p. Davis, J. A., 1923, The Kantishna region, Alaska, in Stewart, B. D., Annual Report of the Mine Inspector to the Governor of Alaska, 1922: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys AR-1922. Decker, J. E., and Gilbert, W. G., 1978, The Mt. Galen volcanics-A new middle Tertiary volcanic formation in central Alaska Range: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Geological Report 59, 11 p. Gates, G. O., and Wahrhaftig, Clyde, 1944, Zinc deposits of the Mount Eielson district, Alaska: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 16, 7 p. Hawley, C. C. and Associates, Inc, 1978, Mineral appraisal of lands adjacent to Mt. McKinley National Park, Alaska: U. S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report 24-78, 275 p. (paged by sections). Joesting, H. R., 1941-1943, Strategic minerals and priorities correspondence: Alaska Territorial Department of
 
矿物 and/or 产地  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
版权所有© mindat.org1993年至2024年,除了规定的地方。 Mindat.org全赖于全球数千个以上成员和支持者们的参与。
隐私政策 - 条款和条款细则 - 联络我们 - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: 2024.4.26 01:23:09 Page updated: 2024.4.14 04:24:34
Go to top of page