Predictive Mineralogy
Possible unrecorded species at Sar-e-Sang River, Sar-e-Sang, Kuran wa Munjan District, Badakhshan, Afghanistan
This table is based on statistical analysis of other localities containing similar species to the ones found at this locality.
Possible missing species | Formula | Match % | Due to recorded presence of |
---|---|---|---|
Quartz | SiO2 | 99.95% | Albite (78.81 %), Calcite (62.43 %), Diopside (51.68 %), Marialite (59.38 %), Orthoclase (76.14 %), Pyrite (67.27 %), Titanite (65.16 %) |
Analcime | Na(AlSi2O6) · H2O | 86.31% | Gonnardite (67.86 %), Thomsonite-Ca (57.41 %) |
Magnetite | Fe2+Fe3+2O4 | 79.26% | Afghanite (53.57 %), Haüyne (55.34 %) |
Natrolite | Na2Al2Si3O10 · 2H2O | 70.91% | Gonnardite (70.92 %) |
Nepheline | Na3K(Al4Si4O16) | 58.10% | Haüyne (58.10 %) |
Sanidine | K(AlSi3O8) | 57.14% | Afghanite (57.14 %) |
Muscovite | KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2 | 52.79% | Albite (52.80 %) |
Chalcopyrite | CuFeS2 | 41.37% | Pyrite (51.72 %) |
Key: Mineral matches key element mineralogy of deposit Key element(s) in mineral not listed for deposit (-20% score)
Predicting paragenetic modes of deposit
Green indicates almost certain match based on minerals unique to a certain deposit type. Yellow indicates a possibly poor match, but should not be entirely discounted. Scores > 100 indicate strong confidence.