February 2023
Feb 2023Questionable argentopolybasitePosted by Martin Stevko. 10 replies.
Feb 2023Interesting pseudomorphPosted by Jennifer Cindrich. 15 replies.
Feb 2023Perthite vs. PrehnitePosted by Ed Clopton. One reply.
Feb 2023stilbite-NaPosted by Krzysztof Andrzejewski. 7 replies.
Feb 2023Picture of the Day 2 24 2023Posted by Keith A. Peregrine.
Feb 2023Specimen analyzed, still flaggedPosted by Jason B. Smith. 2 replies.
Feb 2023Is this calcite from Franklin or Ogdensburg?Posted by Harold Moritz.
Feb 2023Typo errorPosted by Jean-Paul Berthe.
Feb 2023Child Image Submission Error ResolvedPosted by Kaegen Lau. 3 replies.
Feb 2023Tephroite? Help from FrOgophiles needed.Posted by Harold Moritz. One reply.
Feb 2023Green is probably not malachitePosted by Peter Andersen. 17 replies.
Feb 2023Fakes?Posted by Little Big. 22 replies.
Feb 2023is this an Imperial Topaz ?Posted by Askar Abdourazak. 10 replies.
Feb 2023Incorrect species identification for the small lemon yellow tabular crystalsPosted by Peter Andersen. 6 replies.
Feb 2023Incorrect localityPosted by Russ Rizzo. 5 replies.
Feb 2023This centre may be amethyst from the colourPosted by Peter Andersen.
Feb 2023"User gallery" photoPosted by Alessandro Cantamessa. 8 replies.
Feb 2023Incorrect IDPosted by Carsten Slotta. 2 replies.
Feb 2023Incorrect localityPosted by Russ Rizzo. 2 replies.
Feb 2023Bolivian attribution?Posted by Max Merlo. One reply.
Feb 2023Willemite fluorescencePosted by Richard Gunter. 10 replies.
Feb 2023This shorl is probably fluor-schorl as outlined belowPosted by Peter Andersen. 5 replies.
Feb 2023Far out POTD!Posted by Ed Clopton.
Feb 2023Not antimonyPosted by Ruggy Holloway. 4 replies.
Feb 2023Do not think that this specimen in the photo is actually saleeitePosted by Peter Andersen. 9 replies.
Feb 2023Probably zircon, not uraninitePosted by Harold Moritz. 3 replies.
Feb 2023Incorrect locality designation and needs to be changedPosted by Peter Andersen. 5 replies.
Feb 2023Incorrect locality designation and should be changed to Rio Grande do SulPosted by Peter Andersen. 3 replies.
Feb 2023Incorrect locality designation and should be Rio Grande do SulPosted by Peter Andersen. 3 replies.
Feb 2023Incorrect locality designation and should be Rio Grande do SulPosted by Peter Andersen. One reply.
Feb 2023Incorrect locality designation and should be Rio Grande Do SulPosted by Peter Andersen. One reply.
Feb 2023Incorrect Locality designation and should be changed to Rio Grande do SulPosted by Peter Andersen.
Feb 2023Incorrect locality for this specimenPosted by Peter Andersen. 5 replies.
Feb 2023Move photo detail to main photoPosted by José Antonio Soldevilla Gonzalez. 2 replies.
Feb 2023Not Minas Gerais, see descriptionPosted by William W. Besse. 2 replies.
Feb 2023Chauncey Peak, not Chelsea PeakPosted by Harold Moritz. One reply.
Feb 2023Locality nonsense!Posted by Kevin Conroy. 11 replies.
