Gill, Patrick (2011) When should we change the definition of the second?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369 (1953) 4109-4130 doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0237

| Reference Type | Journal (article/letter/editorial) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Title | When should we change the definition of the second? | ||
| Journal | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences | ||
| Authors | Gill, Patrick | Author | |
| Year | 2011 (October 28) | Volume | 369 |
| Issue | 1953 | ||
| Publisher | The Royal Society | ||
| DOI | doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0237Search in ResearchGate | ||
| Generate Citation Formats | |||
| Mindat Ref. ID | 662830 | Long-form Identifier | mindat:1:5:662830:1 |
| GUID | 0 | ||
| Full Reference | Gill, Patrick (2011) When should we change the definition of the second?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369 (1953) 4109-4130 doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0237 | ||
| Plain Text | Gill, Patrick (2011) When should we change the definition of the second?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369 (1953) 4109-4130 doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0237 | ||
| In | (2011, October) Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences Vol. 369 (1953) The Royal Society | ||
See Also
These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() |





