| Reference Type | Journal (article/letter/editorial) |
|---|
| Title | Engineered versus standard evolutionary algorithms: A case study in batch scheduling with recourse |
|---|
| Journal | Computers & Chemical Engineering |
|---|
| Authors | Sand, G. | Author |
|---|
| Till, J. | Author |
| Tometzki, T. | Author |
| Urselmann, M. | Author |
| Engell, S. | Author |
| Emmerich, M. | Author |
| Year | 2008 (November) | Volume | 32 |
|---|
| Publisher | Elsevier BV |
|---|
| DOI | doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.09.006Search in ResearchGate |
|---|
| Generate Citation Formats |
| Mindat Ref. ID | 6608045 | Long-form Identifier | mindat:1:5:6608045:9 |
|---|
|
| GUID | 0 |
|---|
| Full Reference | Sand, G., Till, J., Tometzki, T., Urselmann, M., Engell, S., Emmerich, M. (2008) Engineered versus standard evolutionary algorithms: A case study in batch scheduling with recourse. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32. 2706-2722 doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.09.006 |
|---|
| Plain Text | Sand, G., Till, J., Tometzki, T., Urselmann, M., Engell, S., Emmerich, M. (2008) Engineered versus standard evolutionary algorithms: A case study in batch scheduling with recourse. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32. 2706-2722 doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.09.006 |
|---|
| In | (n.d.) Computers & Chemical Engineering Vol. 32. Elsevier BV |
|---|
These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.