登录注册
Quick Links : Mindat手册The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
主页关于 MindatMindat手册Mindat的历史版权Who We Are联系我们于 Mindat.org刊登广告
捐赠给 MindatCorporate Sponsorship赞助板页已赞助的板页在 Mindat刊登 广告的广告商于 Mindat.org刊登广告
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
搜索矿物的性质搜索矿物的化学Advanced Locality Search随意显示任何一 种矿物Random Locality使用minID搜索邻近产地Search Articles搜索词汇表更多搜索选项
搜索:
矿物名称:
地区产地名称:
关键字:
 
Mindat手册添加新照片Rate Photos产区编辑报告Coordinate Completion Report添加词汇表项目
Mining Companies统计会员列表Mineral MuseumsClubs & Organizations矿物展及活动The Mindat目录表设备设置The Mineral Quiz
照片搜索Photo GalleriesSearch by Color今天最新的照片昨天最新的照片用户照片相集过去每日精选照片相集Photography

Boswell, P. G. H. (1924) The Petrography of the Sands of the Upper Lias and Lower Inferior Oolite in the West of England. Geological Magazine, 61 (6) 246-264 doi:10.1017/s0016756800086337

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleThe Petrography of the Sands of the Upper Lias and Lower Inferior Oolite in the West of England
JournalGeological Magazine
AuthorsBoswell, P. G. H.Author
Year1924 (June)Volume61
Page(s)246-264Issue6
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
DOIdoi:10.1017/s0016756800086337
Mindat Ref. ID280663Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:280663:5
GUIDf480f30e-6fd8-456e-b391-489709ca98db
Full ReferenceBoswell, P. G. H. (1924) The Petrography of the Sands of the Upper Lias and Lower Inferior Oolite in the West of England. Geological Magazine, 61 (6) 246-264 doi:10.1017/s0016756800086337
Plain TextBoswell, P. G. H. (1924) The Petrography of the Sands of the Upper Lias and Lower Inferior Oolite in the West of England. Geological Magazine, 61 (6) 246-264 doi:10.1017/s0016756800086337
In(1924, June) Geological Magazine Vol. 61 (6) Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Abstract/NotesThe main conclusions of the paper may be briefly stated thus:—1. The deposits, which are of neritic facies, possess a characteristic and peculiar mechanical and mineralogical composition, differing therein from any other British deposit.2. They exhibit a general constancy in grade from the Dorset coast to the Cotteswolds. Within this limit they conform to two chief types containing respectively 40 to 50 and 60 to 80 per cent, of the very fine sand grade (greater than 0·05 and less than 0·1 mm.). No variation of mechanical composition with hemeral change can be observed.3. The sands are blue and glauconitic in depth. At the surface they are decalcified and are yellow and brown as a result of oxidation. Minerals such as pyrite and pyrrhotite occur only in depth.4. The mineralogical composition indicates an abundance of highly angular brownish-pink to colourless garnets (possibly derived from rocks like those of the Lizard), but few red or purplish-red varieties; also of micas (including a pseudo-uniaxial, pale-green to colourless variety), together with chlorite, chloritoid, kyanite, staurolite, orthoclase, and microcline.5. Tourmaline is only moderately common and is always the grey-brown variety.6. The abundance of titanium-minerals is characteristic of the deposits. Red and yellow varieties of rutile and sagenite-webs are exceedingly abundant, and anatase, brookite, and sphene are locally so. A reciprocal relation may exist between the occurrence of sphene, ilmenite, and the oxides of titanium.7. Epidote and glaucophane are rare.8. Chlorite, chloritoid, glaucophane, kyanite, and staurolite increase in quantity as the deposits are traced southwards.9. A change in lithology and mineralogy sets in as the deposits are followed north-eastwards into the Midlands and Yorkshire.10. The sands differ markedly in petrology from the various Palæozoic rocks of Wales and the West Country, from the Trias, and from the Cretaceous and Eocene of Devon and Dorset.11. The Ordovician, Domerian, Toarcian, and Aalenian of Normandy and Brittany have been examined petrologically for purposes of comparison, but show little resemblance to the sediments under discussion, having been derived locally from the Palæozoic and pre-Cambrian rocks.12. It is concluded that the Lias–Inferior Oolite sands have been derived from the south or south-west, notably from rocks like those of western Brittany.13. The rise of the Mendip axis was not sufficiently complete at this time to cut off the supply of sediment from the south or south-west. The deposits north and south of the ridge have the same general character.

References Listed

These are the references the publisher has listed as being connected to the article. Please check the article itself for the full list of references which may differ. Not all references are currently linkable within the Digital Library.

Buckman (1890) Monog. Palœontogr. Soc. Inferior Oolite Ammonites , 167
Buckman (1889) Proc. Cotteswold Field-Club The Relations of Dundry with the Dorset-Somerset and Cotteswold Areas during part of the Jurassic period ix, 374
Phillips (1871) Geology of Oxford , 118
Richardson (1915) Proc. Cotteswold Nat. Field Club A Deep Boring at Shipton Moyne near Tetbury, Gloucestershire xix, 49
Woodward (1894) Mem. Geol. Surv. The Jurassic Rocks of Britain iv
Richardson () Proc. Cotteswold Nat. Field Club A Deep Boring at the Waterworks, Tetbury, Gloucestershire , 57


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
矿物 and/or 产地  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
版权所有© mindat.org1993年至2024年,除了规定的地方。 Mindat.org全赖于全球数千个以上成员和支持者们的参与。
隐私政策 - 条款和条款细则 - 联络我们 - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: 2024.5.1 22:31:49
Go to top of page