| Reference Type | Journal (article/letter/editorial) |
|---|
| Title | V.—On some supposed Fossil Remains of Arachnida (?) and Myriopoda from the, English Coal-Measures |
|---|
| Journal | Geological Magazine |
|---|
| Year | 1873 (March) | Series:Volume | 1:10 |
|---|
| Issue | 105 |
|---|
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
|---|
| DOI | doi:10.1017/s0016756800468548 |
|---|
| Generate Citation Formats |
|---|
| Mindat Ref. ID | 278359 | Long-form Identifier | mindat:1:5:278359:2 |
|---|
|
| GUID | 0 |
|---|
| Full Reference | (1873) V.—On some supposed Fossil Remains of Arachnida (?) and Myriopoda from the, English Coal-Measures. Geological Magazine, S. 1 Vol. 10 (105) 104-112 doi:10.1017/s0016756800468548 |
|---|
| Plain Text | (1873) V.—On some supposed Fossil Remains of Arachnida (?) and Myriopoda from the, English Coal-Measures. Geological Magazine, S. 1 Vol. 10 (105) 104-112 doi:10.1017/s0016756800468548 |
|---|
| In | (1873, March) Geological Magazine S. 1 Vol. 10 (105) Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
|---|
| Abstract/Notes | In the fourth part of my Monograph on the Merostomata, published in last year’s volume of the Palæontographical Society’s annual issue, I drew attention to two very singular fossil remains which had been somewhat doubtfully referred by Mr. J. W. Salter to the genus Eurypterus. A portion, at least, of the remains referred by him to Eurypterus? mammatus are really plant-remains (as shown by Mr. Carruthers, op. cit., p. 168), whilst the remainder must, for the present, be classed with M. Jordan’s Arthropleura armatu, from the Coal-measures of Saarbruck, Rhenish Prussia, a very anomalous Crustacean (if it be a Crustacean at all, which I greatly doubt), but which is certainly not a Eurypterus. |
|---|
These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.
