登录注册
Quick Links : Mindat手册The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
主页关于 MindatMindat手册Mindat的历史版权Who We Are联系我们于 Mindat.org刊登广告
捐赠给 MindatCorporate Sponsorship赞助板页已赞助的板页在 Mindat刊登 广告的广告商于 Mindat.org刊登广告
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
搜索矿物的性质搜索矿物的化学Mineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality Search随意显示任何一 种矿物Random Locality使用minID搜索邻近产地Search Articles搜索词汇表更多搜索选项
搜索:
矿物名称:
地区产地名称:
关键字:
 
Mindat手册添加新照片Rate Photos产区编辑报告Coordinate Completion Report添加词汇表项目
Mining Companies统计会员列表Mineral MuseumsClubs & Organizations矿物展及活动The Mindat目录表设备设置The Mineral QuizTime Machine
照片搜索Photo GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour Explorer今天最新的照片昨天最新的照片用户照片相集过去每日精选照片相集Photography

Flemming, Roberta L.; Gao, Song; Freckelton, Candace N.; McCausland, Phil J.A. (2024) Trends in the Unit Cell Parameter for Kimberlitic Versus Non-Kimberlitic and Diamond-Indicating Chromite. The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 62 (1). 61-76 doi:10.3749/2200036

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleTrends in the Unit Cell Parameter for Kimberlitic Versus Non-Kimberlitic and Diamond-Indicating Chromite
JournalThe Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and PetrologyISSN1499-1276
AuthorsFlemming, Roberta L.Author
Gao, SongAuthor
Freckelton, Candace N.Author
McCausland, Phil J.A.Author
Year2024 (January 1)Volume62
Page(s)61-76Issue1
PublisherMineralogical Association of Canada
URL
DOIdoi:10.3749/2200036Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Classification
Not set
LoC
Not set
Mindat Ref. ID18655772Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:18655772:9
GUID0
Full ReferenceFlemming, Roberta L.; Gao, Song; Freckelton, Candace N.; McCausland, Phil J.A. (2024) Trends in the Unit Cell Parameter for Kimberlitic Versus Non-Kimberlitic and Diamond-Indicating Chromite. The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 62 (1). 61-76 doi:10.3749/2200036
Plain TextFlemming, Roberta L.; Gao, Song; Freckelton, Candace N.; McCausland, Phil J.A. (2024) Trends in the Unit Cell Parameter for Kimberlitic Versus Non-Kimberlitic and Diamond-Indicating Chromite. The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 62 (1). 61-76 doi:10.3749/2200036
In(2024, January) The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology Vol. 62. Mineralogical Association of Canada
Abstract/NotesAbstract
Spinel-group minerals are among the best-known and widely used minerals in diamond exploration due to their ubiquity, resistance to weathering, and utility as petrogenetic indicators. The kimberlite indicator mineral chromite is investigated in this study using micro-X-ray diffraction (µXRD) to measure chromite unit cell parameter ao. We used epoxy-mounted chromium-rich spinel (henceforward called ‘chromite’) mineral separates with known chemical composition from kimberlitic and non-kimberlitic sources to evaluate structural-chemical correlations for potential use in diamond exploration. Chromite grains of <300 µm size from the Koala, Misery, and Sheiba kimberlites in the Ekati property (Northwest Territories, Canada), as well as from exploration programs in Botswana and Gabon, Africa, were examined in situ, as mounted for standard electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). Unit cell parameter ao was measured by µXRD for several natural kimberlitic and non-kimberlitic chromite grains, and these data have been correlated with chemical composition as determined by EPMA on a grain-by-grain basis. Conventional chemical discrimination plots with unit cell size denoted by color demonstrate clearly discernable unit cell trends that are useful for classification. Two kimberlitic chromite compositional trends can be discriminated by chromite unit cell size. The kimberlitic phenocryst trend is delineated by a distinct increase in unit cell size (ao > 8.336 Å), whereas the kimberlitic xenocryst trend is delineated by a distinct decrease in the unit cell (ao < 8.322 Å). The latter trend is also followed by the Gabon non-kimberlitic samples. Notably, the unit cell parameters for chromite in the diamond-indicating field have a tightly determined value of ao = 8.329 (± 0.007) (or 8.322–8.336 Å). This field partially overlaps with the unit cell values for some non-kimberlitic chromites (e.g., Botswana). Unit cell values of chromite grains recovered from heavy mineral concentrates could serve as a preliminary screening technique for identifying diamond-indicating chromites prior to chemical analysis if their kimberlitic provenance is known. More broadly, the μ-XRD unit cell technique is a useful, non-destructive tool that shows promise for application to other kimberlite indicator minerals.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
版权所有© mindat.org1993年至2026年,除了规定的地方。 Mindat.org全赖于全球数千个以上成员和支持者们的参与。
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
隐私政策 - 条款和条款细则 - 联络我们 - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: 2026.6.9 02:24:40
Go to top of page