UM1990-60-SiO:AlCaFe
A material that is NOT an approved mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Formula:
Ca-Al-Fe-Si-O
Al and Fe are minor constituents
Colour:
white
Originally reported as "UK72".
Forms irregular patches and balls composed of powder or very fine fibers, in marble xenoliths.
Forms irregular patches and balls composed of powder or very fine fibers, in marble xenoliths.
Unique Identifiers
Mindat ID:
51749
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:51749:0
GUID
(UUID V4):
(UUID V4):
07e3bcee-9401-4f9c-a6f0-0a40da8b4681
Physical Properties of UM1990-60-SiO:AlCaFe
Colour:
white
Chemistry of UM1990-60-SiO:AlCaFe
Mindat Formula:
Ca-Al-Fe-Si-O
Al and Fe are minor constituents
Al and Fe are minor constituents
X-Ray Powder Diffraction
Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacing | Intensity |
---|---|
16.9 Å | (100) |
3.410 Å | (40) |
3.105 Å | (90) |
2.930 Å | (50) |
1.893 Å | (50) |
1.876 Å | (70) |
Other Information
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.
Internet Links for UM1990-60-SiO:AlCaFe
mindat.org URL:
https://www.mindat.org/min-51749.html
Please feel free to link to this page.
Please feel free to link to this page.
Search Engines:
Mineral Dealers:
References for UM1990-60-SiO:AlCaFe
Reference List:
Localities for UM1990-60-SiO:AlCaFe
Locality List
- This locality has map coordinates listed.
- This locality has estimated coordinates.
ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence.
? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality.
- Good crystals or important locality for species.
- World class for species or very significant.
(TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species.
(FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties).
Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality.
Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Canada | |
| Chao et al. (1990) +1 other reference |