登录注册
Quick Links : Mindat手册The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
主页关于 MindatMindat手册Mindat的历史版权Who We Are联系我们于 Mindat.org刊登广告
捐赠给 MindatCorporate Sponsorship赞助板页已赞助的板页在 Mindat刊登 广告的广告商于 Mindat.org刊登广告
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
搜索矿物的性质搜索矿物的化学Advanced Locality Search随意显示任何一 种矿物Random Locality使用minID搜索邻近产地Search Articles搜索词汇表更多搜索选项
搜索:
矿物名称:
地区产地名称:
关键字:
 
Mindat手册添加新照片Rate Photos产区编辑报告Coordinate Completion Report添加词汇表项目
Mining Companies统计会员列表Mineral MuseumsClubs & Organizations矿物展及活动The Mindat目录表设备设置The Mineral Quiz
照片搜索Photo GalleriesSearch by Color今天最新的照片昨天最新的照片用户照片相集过去每日精选照片相集Photography

LocalitiesUpper Auluta River, Malaita Island, Malaita Province, Solomon Islands

I have read Allen & Deans, and I see no justification for the existence of this locality. A&D do not describe a "Upper Auluta River" locality as a separate locality, but they describe the nr. 1 and nr. 2 localities as shown on the map at page 3 of their publication (https://rruff.info/doclib/MinMag/Volume_34/34-268-16.pdf) located at tributaries of the Upper Auluta River.  I propose to delete this locality.

27th Apr 2024 00:20 UTCKeith Compton 🌟 Manager

I disagree the text states:

"In a small tributary of the Upper Auluta River (locality 1) a trail of ilmenite led to the outcrop of the ankaratrite, which appeared to be fairly extensive".

I suppose you could change the No. 2 locality to read something like: Unnamed locality, Unnamed tributary of Kwaifa River, Upper Auluta River, Malaita Island .. etc.

To delete it altogether would be inaccurate.

The No. 1 locality is in the Hohomela River which is a tributary of the upper Auluta River
Yes, locality 1 on the map is located in a tributary of the Upper Auluta River, but NOT in the Upper Auluta River itself.

Nowhere in the text it is suggested that the Upper Auluta River itself is a locality where samples have been taken, and therefore it should be deleted as a locality.

Or, alternatively, the Upper Auluta River could become the parent locality, with the Alnöite and Ankaratrite localities as child localities.

It would anyway be more correct to register these as separate localities.

But to have 3 localities, of which 2 are true localities where samples have been taken, and 1 with only geograpical relevance, seems a bit redundant.

I would personally prefer to drop the Upper Auluta locality altogether. I do not see that any relevant/important data is contained/preserved in having such a locality registered at Mindat.
 
and/or  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
版权所有© mindat.org1993年至2024年,除了规定的地方。 Mindat.org全赖于全球数千个以上成员和支持者们的参与。
隐私政策 - 条款和条款细则 - 联络我们 - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: 2024.5.8 06:26:08
Go to top of page