Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
搜索矿物的性质搜索矿物的化学Advanced Locality Search随意显示任何一 种矿物Random Locality使用minID搜索邻近产地Search Articles搜索词汇表更多搜索选项
╳Discussions
💬 Home🔎 Search📅 LatestGroups
EducationOpen discussion area.Fakes & FraudsOpen discussion area.Field CollectingOpen discussion area.FossilsOpen discussion area.Gems and GemologyOpen discussion area.GeneralOpen discussion area.How to ContributeOpen discussion area.Identity HelpOpen discussion area.Improving Mindat.orgOpen discussion area.LocalitiesOpen discussion area.Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area.MarketplaceOpen discussion area.MeteoritesOpen discussion area.Mindat ProductsOpen discussion area.Mineral ExchangesOpen discussion area.Mineral PhotographyOpen discussion area.Mineral ShowsOpen discussion area.Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area.Mineralogy CourseOpen discussion area.MineralsOpen discussion area.Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area.PhotosOpen discussion area.Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area.The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area.UV MineralsOpen discussion area.Recent Images in Discussions
204197
LocalitiesUpper Auluta River, Malaita Island, Malaita Province, Solomon Islands
26th Apr 2024 21:45 UTCThe Evje og Hornnes geomuseum, Fennefoss Expert
27th Apr 2024 00:20 UTCKeith Compton 🌟 Manager
"In a small tributary of the Upper Auluta River (locality 1) a trail of ilmenite led to the outcrop of the ankaratrite, which appeared to be fairly extensive".
I suppose you could change the No. 2 locality to read something like: Unnamed locality, Unnamed tributary of Kwaifa River, Upper Auluta River, Malaita Island .. etc.
To delete it altogether would be inaccurate.
The No. 1 locality is in the Hohomela River which is a tributary of the upper Auluta River
28th Apr 2024 10:33 UTCThe Evje og Hornnes geomuseum, Fennefoss Expert
Nowhere in the text it is suggested that the Upper Auluta River itself is a locality where samples have been taken, and therefore it should be deleted as a locality.
Or, alternatively, the Upper Auluta River could become the parent locality, with the Alnöite and Ankaratrite localities as child localities.
It would anyway be more correct to register these as separate localities.
But to have 3 localities, of which 2 are true localities where samples have been taken, and 1 with only geograpical relevance, seems a bit redundant.
I would personally prefer to drop the Upper Auluta locality altogether. I do not see that any relevant/important data is contained/preserved in having such a locality registered at Mindat.
版权所有© mindat.org1993年至2024年,除了规定的地方。 Mindat.org全赖于全球数千个以上成员和支持者们的参与。
隐私政策 - 条款和条款细则 - 联络我们 - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: 2024.5.8 06:26:08
隐私政策 - 条款和条款细则 - 联络我们 - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: 2024.5.8 06:26:08