Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
搜索矿物的性质搜索矿物的化学Advanced Locality Search随意显示任何一 种矿物Random Locality使用minID搜索邻近产地Search Articles搜索词汇表更多搜索选项
╳Discussions
💬 Home🔎 Search📅 LatestGroups
EducationOpen discussion area.Fakes & FraudsOpen discussion area.Field CollectingOpen discussion area.FossilsOpen discussion area.Gems and GemologyOpen discussion area.GeneralOpen discussion area.How to ContributeOpen discussion area.Identity HelpOpen discussion area.Improving Mindat.orgOpen discussion area.LocalitiesOpen discussion area.Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area.MarketplaceOpen discussion area.MeteoritesOpen discussion area.Mindat ProductsOpen discussion area.Mineral ExchangesOpen discussion area.Mineral PhotographyOpen discussion area.Mineral ShowsOpen discussion area.Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area.Mineralogy CourseOpen discussion area.MineralsOpen discussion area.Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area.PhotosOpen discussion area.Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area.The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area.UV MineralsOpen discussion area.Recent Images in Discussions
Improving Mindat.orgComplicated duplicate MinIDs
24th Apr 2024 01:37 UTCEd Clopton 🌟 Expert
Three photos depicting the same specimens (sort of) have three different MinIDs. Photo 225717 depicts a pair of gypsum crystals from Mahoning County, Ohio with MinID 3QV-583. Photo 1221917 depicts one of the same crystals with MinID 2TK-KA4, and photo 1221918 depicts the other crystal with MinID 12219189. The latter two photos are more recent and higher resolution than the earlier photo and contain considerable background info in their captions.
This isn't the usual case of two photos of the same specimen with different MinIDs that can be merged. Is it something that can or should be fixed? I don't have an opinion, I just noticed the situation and thought I would mention it in case it matters to someone.
24th Apr 2024 01:59 UTCJamison K. Brizendine 🌟 Expert
24th Apr 2024 03:27 UTCKeith Compton 🌟 Manager
If there is only the one specimen - there should only be one minId no matter how many photos of the mineral specimen, wide angle, close ups -even of different minerals on the same rock.
Your mineral catalogue is your domain so that is not affected.
Nothing unusual in specimens having multiple minIDs - we simply merge them so that there is only the one.
Should your specimen go to someone else a sole minID would go with it.
24th Apr 2024 17:36 UTCJolyon Ralph Founder
版权所有© mindat.org1993年至2024年,除了规定的地方。 Mindat.org全赖于全球数千个以上成员和支持者们的参与。
隐私政策 - 条款和条款细则 - 联络我们 - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: 2024.5.5 14:14:42
隐私政策 - 条款和条款细则 - 联络我们 - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: 2024.5.5 14:14:42