Yes there are something not correct here  that needs to be sorted out.

I see that we have  two Golconda districts, non of them political entities. We have the non -hierchial Golconda pegmatite field, see https://www.mindat.org/loc-4513.html

but  also  Golconda  (defined as a mining district,  as a sublocality under Governador Valadares) . https://www.mindat.org/loc-281837.html

I am not sure if we need both? Are they not the same?

Thanks for your answer. The problem as I see it it not the question of moving Ipê under Golconda, that may be done relatively easily. The problem is about the hierarchy and the proper updated division of the Municipality of Governador Valadares into separate districts. So thanks for helping us sorting this out.

I can not find Golconda district listed under the lists of districts in the Municipality of Governador Valadares: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_de_distritos_de_Governador_Valadares

Is there a fault with the list? Or is it not updated ?

I also  see that some mines listed under the Golconda (mining district) , belongs to Santo Antônio do Pontal  district.  Thus when differnt mines in a mining district are belonging to different political districts, we are using a non-hierarchial localities in Mindat. The

See https://www.mindat.org/loc-439748.html

 Jhonatan, I really do respect  that natives in a country knows their country far more better than a foreigner that has not set their foot in the country - and that is one of the reason for countinuing this conversation. And the second reason is to try to clear up things so that the facts are not based on subjective ideas but on objective ones.

And yes, sometime Wikipedia contains mistakes- and that was the reason for asking my questions above.

You said above:

Going to the official site of the Governador Valadares  https://www.valadares.mg.gov.br/