UM1971-07-S:AgBiCuPb
A material that is NOT an approved mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Formula:
Pb(Cu,Ag)2.2Bi4.6S7.7
Colour:
steel-gray
Lustre:
Metallic
Affinity to benjaminite, possibly identical to it. Poor analytical data quality. From Kaptarkhan deposit, East Karamazar, Tajikistan.
As bladded aggregates, to 1.5 cm, and veinlets.
As bladded aggregates, to 1.5 cm, and veinlets.
Unique Identifiers
Mindat ID:
47231
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:47231:9
GUID
(UUID V4):
(UUID V4):
cfa56733-e677-4503-b3b9-bc83d984a724
Physical Properties of UM1971-07-S:AgBiCuPb
Metallic
Colour:
steel-gray
Chemical Properties of UM1971-07-S:AgBiCuPb
Formula:
Pb(Cu,Ag)2.2Bi4.6S7.7
X-Ray Powder Diffraction
Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacing | Intensity |
---|---|
3.518-3.52 Å | (30-20) |
3.423-3.432 Å | (30) |
2.842-2.85O Å | (100) |
2.004-2.001 Å | (80) |
Other Information
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.
Internet Links for UM1971-07-S:AgBiCuPb
mindat.org URL:
https://www.mindat.org/min-47231.html
Please feel free to link to this page.
Please feel free to link to this page.
Search Engines:
Mineral Dealers:
References for UM1971-07-S:AgBiCuPb
Reference List:
Localities for UM1971-07-S:AgBiCuPb
Locality List
- This locality has map coordinates listed.
- This locality has estimated coordinates.
ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence.
? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality.
- Good crystals or important locality for species.
- World class for species or very significant.
(TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species.
(FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties).
Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality.
Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Tajikistan | |
|