New Concord meteorite, New Concord, Muskingum Co., Ohio, USA
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84): | 40° 0' North , 81° 46' West |
---|---|
Latitude & Longitude (decimal): | 40.00000,-81.76667 |
Non-native locality type: | Meteorite |
Meteorite Class: | L6 chondrite meteorite |
Meteoritical Society Class: | L6 |
Metbull: | View entry in Meteoritical Bulletin Database |
Köppen climate type: | Cfa : Humid subtropical climate |
Ordinary chondrite, veined (L6)
Fall, 1 May 1860; 230 kg, shower
Just after noon numerous detonations and roaring sounds were heard accompanying the appearance of a NW moving and unusually luminous bolide and a shower of stones fell over an ~16 km x 5 km region. A number were seen as black specks in the sky before falling with several penetrating the ground to a depth of 0.6—0.9 m. A colt was killed by one of the stones. Over 30 stones, almost invariably covered with a black fusion crust, were found — the most massive stone (~47 kg) cutting two roots at the base of an oak tree. Thin sections reveal numerous olivine- and orthopyroxene-rich chondrules (≤1.5 mm) within a groundmass of olivine, orthopyroxene, and opaques. Opaque material is usually interstitial to the silicates and frequently concentrated at chondrule rims. Plagioclase (albite) is even more Na-rich than is normal for ordinary chondrites. Within the Fe-Ni metal, kamacite is considerably more abundant than taenite. Other minor phases (listed below) are more or less expected in well-described chondrites of sufficient mass. Uniform olivine composition (Fa22), orthopyroxene composition (Fs21), and total iron abundance (21.6%) are all characteristic of the L group of ordinary chondrites. Veining plus inconsistencies in gas retention ages (0.74 Ga for He;1.7 Ga for Ar) make it clear that New Concord has suffered significant shock. Limonite stains in some samples of such a widely witnessed fall may be due either to late recovery or to inadequate storage procedures of the particular samples.
L chondrites are the most abundant geochemical group of meteorites with L6 the most common petrologic type. Of the 269 witnessed L6 falls, New Concord is the 4th most massive L6 of those currently listed with the Meteoritical Bulletin Database (Feb 2016). The largest individual New Concord stone has been at Marietta College while a number of other moderately large masses are distributed elsewhere.
Mineral List
11 valid minerals.
Meteorite/Rock Types Recorded
Note: this is a very new system on mindat.org and data is currently VERY limited. Please bear with us while we work towards adding this information!
Select Rock List Type
Alphabetical List Tree DiagramThis page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to
visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders
for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.
References
Sort by Year (asc) | by Year (desc) | by Author (A-Z) | by Author (Z-A)
Andrews, E. B. (1860) An account of the fall of meteoric stones at New Concord, Ohio, May 1st, 1860: American Journal of Science 30: 103-111.
Shepard, C. U. (1860) Notices of several American Meteorites: American Journal of Science 30: 204-208.
Smith, J.L. (1861) The Guernsey County (Ohio) meteorites-a complete account of the phenomena attending their fall with a chemical analysis of them. Amer. Jour. Sci. 31:87-98.
Shannon, E.V. & Larsen, E.S. (1925) Merrillite and chlorapatite from stony meteorites. Amer. Jour. Sci. 9: 250-260.
Mason, B. & Wiik, H.B. (1961) The Composition of the Ottawa, Chateau-Renard, Mocs, and New Concord Meteorites: American Museum Novitates, #2069: 26 pp. (Dec 1961).
Taylor, G.J. (1968) On the Thermal History of Chondrites: Master's Thesis: Rice University. 73 pages.
Ramdohr, P. (1973). The Opaque Minerals in Stony Meteorites.Elsevier Publishing Company: Amsterdam; London: New York. 245 pages.
Alexeev, V. A. & Kuyunko, N. S. (1996) Porosity of Chondrites: Some Regularities: Lunar and Planetary Science 27: 9-4. (Mar 1996).
Dunn, T.L., Cressy, G., McSween Jr, H.Y. & McCoy, T.J. (2010) Analysis of ordinary chondrites using powder X-ray diffraction: 1. Modal mineral abundances. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 45(1):123-134. (Jan 2010).
External Links
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php - MeteoriticalBulletinDatabase
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=16953 -New Concord@MetBullDatabase
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/get_original_photo.php?recno=5630935 - New Concord photo
http://www.meteoritehistory.info/AJS/S2VIEWS/V30P103.HTM - Fall phenomena
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=16953 -New Concord@MetBullDatabase
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/get_original_photo.php?recno=5630935 - New Concord photo
http://www.meteoritehistory.info/AJS/S2VIEWS/V30P103.HTM - Fall phenomena