Sliscovich Mine, Nome Mining District, Nome Census Area, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types | |
---|---|
Sliscovich Mine | Mine |
Nome Mining District | Mining District |
Nome Census Area | Census Area |
Alaska | State |
USA | Country |
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
64° 45' 36'' North , 165° 18' 43'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Köppen climate type:
Nearest Settlements:
Place | Population | Distance |
---|---|---|
Nome | 3,806 (2018) | 29.1km |
Mindat Locality ID:
200023
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:200023:0
GUID (UUID V4):
bf1fc1d5-f4b5-4d6c-b5fb-6ce19be634f2
Location: The Sliscovich claims extend north-northeast for about 1.5 miles from the gentle ridge between Cold and Manila Creeks into the head of Manila Creek. From southwest to northeast the claims are the Greater Alaska, My Best Lode, Sliscovich Discovery, Nasradin and Distin claims (two wide), and Discovery and Manilla Extension Lodes (two wide). The claims correspond generally with localities 15 and 16 of Hummel (1962 [MF 248]). The location used here is approximately the end line between Sliscovich Discovery and Distin lode claims (U.S. Mineral Survey No. 1380). The location is accurate to 0.1 mile of the coordinates. It is locality 28 of Cobb (1972 [MF 46], 1978 [OFR 78-93]).
Geology: At least two distinctive types of mineral deposits occur on the Sliscovich claim block. A vein, probably continuous with mineralization at the Breen East prospect (NM085), strikes about east-west and appears to trend onto the southwest part of the My Best Lode claim, where it was opened by adits and trenches. Farther southwest, stibnite-bearing veins near a contact between metasedimentary schist and marble are subparallel to the alignment of the Sliscovich Discovery claim, and stibnite float is found at or below this contact for the length of the claim. Workings in the northeast part of the Sliscovich Discovery claim are, at least in part, on the contact of metasedimentary schist underlying marble (D. Simpson, Bear Creek Mining Company, written communication, 1984). The contact zone on the Sliscovich Discovery claim was probably developed when the property was visited by Chapin in 1913 (Chapin, 1914, p. 403-404). Chapin described the occurrence as a quartz-stibnite vein that strikes N 60 E and dips 45 degrees northwest. Stibnite was mostly on the footwall, but it also occurred as veins and nests in quartz (Cathcart, 1922). Gouge and slickensides were locally present on both footwall and hanging wall (Mertie, 1918 [B 662-I, p. 425-449]). The vein was developed by a 315-foot adit, a drift on the lode, and an incline from the drift. A 70-foot-long part of the lode was mined for antimony in 1915 from the incline workings. In general, the vein that remained was only a few inches wide, but Cathcart (1922, p. 230) found one section about 45 inches thick that consisted of 13 inches of stibnite and 32 inches of opaque quartz. The vein was similar to that at the Hed & [and] Strand mine (NM070) with most of the quartz on the hanging wall. Massive stibnite-quartz float occurs on the My Best Lode claim and appears to be from the same vein developed on the Breen West claims (NM087). Cathcart (1922) reported some steeply dipping quartz veinlets with northeast strike. A small ore shipment reported by Chapin (1914) contained about 35 percent antimony; gold and silver were present, but their values were not reported. An 88-ton ore shipment in 1915 returned most of its value in gold (Mertie, 1918). Gold values obtained by Bear Creek Mining locally exceeded 1 ounce per ton. Gamble and others (1985, p. 28) reported that antimony-rich samples contained 4.4 to 6.5 ppm gold, 2 to 7 ppm silver, and 100 to 250 ppm arsenic. The Sliscovich mine is in metasedimentary schist near an overlying marble. A granitic orthogniess is mapped upslope to the north (Hummel, 1962 [MF 248]). The metamorphic rocks are part of the Nome Group, which is derived from Proterozoic to early Paleozoic protoliths (Till and Dumoulin, 1994). The Nome Group underwent regional blueschist facies metamorphism in the Late Jurassic or Early Cretaceous (Sainsbury, Coleman, and Kachadoorian, 1970; Forbes and others, 1984; Thurston, 1985; Armstrong and others, 1986; Hannula and McWilliams, 1995). The blueschist facies rocks were recrystallized to greenschist facies or higher metamorphic grades in conjunction with regional extension, crustal melting, and magmatism in the mid-Cretaceous (Hudson and Arth, 1983; Miller and Hudson, 1991; Miller and others, 1992; Dumitru and others, 1995; Hannula and others, 1995; Hudson, 1994; Amato and others, 1994; Amato and Wright, 1997, 1998). Lode gold mineralization on Seward Peninsula is mostly related to the higher temperature metamorphism in the mid-Cretaceous (Apodoca, 1994; Ford, 1993 [thesis]; Ford and Snee, 1996; Goldfarb and others, 1997). The antimony-gold deposits are probably of about the same age.
Workings: The claims of the Sliscovich group were located between June 20, 1907, and January 1, 1917, and were patented to James F. Halpin in 1924. According to Chapin (1914, p. 403-404), at least one claim was located as early as 1905. The Sliscovich Discovery claim was developed by 315-foot adit and an incline driven 100 feet along the vein. Stibnite was mined from a 70-foot-long stope. These workings were driven in 1915 or before. The My Best Lode claim also has mine workings. The area was explored by Mapco in about 1981-82. The Sliscovich claims were mapped during Bear Creek Mining's option of the Breen claims (D. Simpson, written communication, 1984). Subsequently the area was studied by BHP (Ford, 1993 [thesis]). The area is within an extensive east-west, gold and arsenic soil anomaly identified by BHP.
Age: Mid-Cretaceous?; controlled by structures that post-date regional metamorphism; may be same age as some lode gold deposits of Seward Peninsula.
Alteration: Chapin (1914, p. 404) reported that the footwall was strongly bleached for about 15 inches and converted to quartz and sericite with fine-grained white pyrite (arsenopyrite?). The hanging wall was silicified. D. Simpson (Bear Creek Mining Company, written communication, 1984) found that the footwall schist was sheared, and altered and carried small amounts of arsenopyrite.
Production: A small ore shipment reported by Chapin (1914) contained about 35 percent antimony; gold and silver were present, but their values were not reported. An 88-ton ore shipment in 1915 returned most of its value in gold (Mertie, 1918 [B 662-I, p. 425-449]). Gold values obtained by Bear Creek Mining locally exceeded 1 ounce per ton. Gamble and others (1985, p. 28) reported that antimony-rich samples contained 4.4 to 6.5 ppm gold, 2 to 7 ppm silver, and 100 to 250 ppm arsenic.
Commodities (Major) - Au, Sb; (Minor) - Ag, As
Development Status: Yes; small
Deposit Model: Simple Sb deposits and low sulfide, Au-quartz vein? (Cox and Singer, 1986; mode
Select Mineral List Type
Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical ElementsCommodity List
This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.Mineral List
7 valid minerals.
Detailed Mineral List:
ⓘ Albite Formula: Na(AlSi3O8) |
ⓘ Ankerite Formula: Ca(Fe2+,Mg)(CO3)2 |
ⓘ Arsenopyrite Formula: FeAsS |
ⓘ Gold Formula: Au |
ⓘ Pyrite Formula: FeS2 |
ⓘ Quartz Formula: SiO2 |
ⓘ Stibnite Formula: Sb2S3 |
Gallery:
List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification
Group 1 - Elements | |||
---|---|---|---|
ⓘ | Gold | 1.AA.05 | Au |
Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts | |||
ⓘ | Stibnite | 2.DB.05 | Sb2S3 |
ⓘ | Pyrite | 2.EB.05a | FeS2 |
ⓘ | Arsenopyrite | 2.EB.20 | FeAsS |
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides | |||
ⓘ | Quartz | 4.DA.05 | SiO2 |
Group 5 - Nitrates and Carbonates | |||
ⓘ | Ankerite | 5.AB.10 | Ca(Fe2+,Mg)(CO3)2 |
Group 9 - Silicates | |||
ⓘ | Albite | 9.FA.35 | Na(AlSi3O8) |
List of minerals for each chemical element
C | Carbon | |
---|---|---|
C | ⓘ Ankerite | Ca(Fe2+,Mg)(CO3)2 |
O | Oxygen | |
O | ⓘ Albite | Na(AlSi3O8) |
O | ⓘ Ankerite | Ca(Fe2+,Mg)(CO3)2 |
O | ⓘ Quartz | SiO2 |
Na | Sodium | |
Na | ⓘ Albite | Na(AlSi3O8) |
Mg | Magnesium | |
Mg | ⓘ Ankerite | Ca(Fe2+,Mg)(CO3)2 |
Al | Aluminium | |
Al | ⓘ Albite | Na(AlSi3O8) |
Si | Silicon | |
Si | ⓘ Albite | Na(AlSi3O8) |
Si | ⓘ Quartz | SiO2 |
S | Sulfur | |
S | ⓘ Arsenopyrite | FeAsS |
S | ⓘ Pyrite | FeS2 |
S | ⓘ Stibnite | Sb2S3 |
Ca | Calcium | |
Ca | ⓘ Ankerite | Ca(Fe2+,Mg)(CO3)2 |
Fe | Iron | |
Fe | ⓘ Ankerite | Ca(Fe2+,Mg)(CO3)2 |
Fe | ⓘ Arsenopyrite | FeAsS |
Fe | ⓘ Pyrite | FeS2 |
As | Arsenic | |
As | ⓘ Arsenopyrite | FeAsS |
Sb | Antimony | |
Sb | ⓘ Stibnite | Sb2S3 |
Au | Gold | |
Au | ⓘ Gold | Au |
Other Databases
Link to USGS - Alaska: | NM086 |
---|
Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality
North America PlateTectonic Plate
- Brooks-Seward DomainDomain
This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to
visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders
for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.