Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
搜索矿物的性质搜索矿物的化学Advanced Locality Search随意显示任何一 种矿物Random Locality使用minID搜索邻近产地Search Articles搜索词汇表更多搜索选项
╳Discussions
💬 Home🔎 Search📅 LatestGroups
EducationOpen discussion area.Fakes & FraudsOpen discussion area.Field CollectingOpen discussion area.FossilsOpen discussion area.Gems and GemologyOpen discussion area.GeneralOpen discussion area.How to ContributeOpen discussion area.Identity HelpOpen discussion area.Improving Mindat.orgOpen discussion area.LocalitiesOpen discussion area.Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area.MarketplaceOpen discussion area.MeteoritesOpen discussion area.Mindat ProductsOpen discussion area.Mineral ExchangesOpen discussion area.Mineral PhotographyOpen discussion area.Mineral ShowsOpen discussion area.Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area.Mineralogy CourseOpen discussion area.MineralsOpen discussion area.Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area.PhotosOpen discussion area.Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area.The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area.UV MineralsOpen discussion area.Recent Images in Discussions
Identity HelpIs Fayalite at Forsythe Iron Mine and possible locality spelling error?
26th Nov 2014 23:52 UTCJohn Oostenryk
Trying to track down details on a specimen from Ward's Supply.
stock # 49-1555. Fayalite w/ magnetite from Forsythe Iron Mine in Quebec, Canada.
1st) Mindat has the location spelled as Forsyth (No E at end) Numerous references use the e~ which is correct spelling? (searching with the E gets you zero within Mindat~ hence the question.)
2nd) My Prof is the doubter- he sees no fayalite under loupe.
Mindat shows no Fayalite at Forsythe. I can confirm graphite and magnetite visually in the specimen(10x Leica scope). Not sure what else I am looking at...
Does anyone have any experience with this material?
There are several articles in first 10 via Google~ they all are doing comparative analysis stuff and are referencing the same Wards stock #.
I am thinking that the mineral is there- as they are obtaining results- just that it is not discernible. Maybe our specimen is lean or lame! ;)
Thanks in advance for any knowledge input !
~JO:)
ps: I don't think a pic is useful here- this is more a technical Question and I'm away from camera right now- but can add a pic of shiny black rock with shiny black cleavages/partings if desired:)
27th Jan 2015 04:39 UTCJohn Oostenryk
27th Jan 2015 15:43 UTCReiner Mielke Expert
I think it is a spelling error and should have been Forsyth ( assuming Sabina got it right). The deposit is in marble so I don't think temperatures would have been high enough to create fayalite. However I am no expert on this so it may be possible that there are small amounts associated with the magnetite. I think that one would have to do a thin section to determine if any fayalite is present. Most of the black cleavages look to me like hornblende which is commonly found there.
24th Feb 2015 21:42 UTCWilliam Size
I have the same specimen from Ward's. Have you been able to determine what the black mineral is?
Thanks,
Bill
版权所有© mindat.org1993年至2024年,除了规定的地方。 Mindat.org全赖于全球数千个以上成员和支持者们的参与。
隐私政策 - 条款和条款细则 - 联络我们 - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: 2024.5.2 13:33:53
隐私政策 - 条款和条款细则 - 联络我们 - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: 2024.5.2 13:33:53