Quick Links : Mindat手册 The Rock H. Currier Digital Library Mindat Newsletter [Free Download]

主页关于 Mindat Mindat手册 Mindat的历史版权 Who We Are 联系我们于 Mindat.org刊登广告

捐赠给 Mindat Corporate Sponsorship 赞助板页已赞助的板页在 Mindat刊登广告的广告商于 Mindat.org刊登广告

Learning Center What is a mineral?The most common minerals on earth Information for Educators Mindat Articles The Elements The Rock H. Currier Digital Library Geologic Time

搜索矿物的性质搜索矿物的化学 Advanced Locality Search 随意显示任何一种矿物 Random Locality 使用minID搜索邻近产地 Search Articles 搜索词汇表更多搜索选项

Mindat手册添加新照片 Rate Photos 产区编辑报告 Coordinate Completion Report 添加词汇表项目

Mining Companies 统计会员列表 Mineral Museums Clubs & Organizations 矿物展及活动 The Mindat目录表设备设置 The Mineral Quiz

照片搜索 Photo Galleries Search by Color 今天最新的照片昨天最新的照片用户照片相集过去每日精选照片相集 Photography

Discussions

💬 Home 🔎 Search 📅 Latest

╳Discussions

💬 Home 🔎 Search 📅 Latest

Groups

Recent Images in Discussions

Improving Mindat.orgQuestionable Schirmerite photo

19th Jan 2011 14:43 UTCLefteris Rantos Expert

Hi,

http://www.mindat.org/photo-283342.html

This photo shows an acicular sulphosalt, labeled as Schirmerite. The locality is not listed for Schirmerite and there is no mention if the sample is analyzed.

Although these sulphosalts are absolutely impossible to distinguish without analysis, a very similar specimen from the same locality has been analyzed as Sb-rich Gustavite http://rruff.info/R100203 . Please not that the analyzed specimen in the RRUFF website was also previously labeled as Schirmerite!! (see the "view label" link)

I think that at least a note should be added to the caption, stating that the sample is not analyzed and it's ID is questionable.

Lefteris

19th Jan 2011 18:33 UTCRob Woodside 🌟 Manager

Message sent

19th Jan 2011 22:08 UTCMarko Burkhardt Expert

Hello!

I will try to get more information. It was sold as "analyzed" Schirmerite, thats all I can tell at the moment.

Marko

6th Mar 2011 22:12 UTCMarko Burkhardt Expert

Hello!

I got some new information today. This mineral is not really Schirmerite. The last analysis show that it is also not Sb-rich Gustavite. Some more analysis is done and will be done. Publication will come soon.

Marko

7th Mar 2011 16:01 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

Changed to "Other photo"/"Unidentified mineral".

22nd Oct 2011 15:26 UTCLefteris Rantos Expert

Back to this old thread...

This might be the new species Terrywallaceite (IMA 2011-017). See http://rruff.info/terrywallaceite/display=default/

Lefteris.

22nd Oct 2011 20:08 UTCMarko Burkhardt Expert

I had the same idea and asked the seller about it (At the moment he also sells Terrywallaceite).

When my sample was sold as Schirmerite, he sold some Sb-rich Gustavites at the same time. These Sb-rich Gustavites turned out to be the Terrywallaceite.

But I once got the information that there was some analysis about the "Schirmerite" running and it perhaps will also turn out to be a new mineral.

That's all I know at the moment.

Marko

22nd Oct 2011 21:36 UTCLefteris Rantos Expert

Actually the Terrywallaceite on RRUFF ( http://rruff.info/terrywallaceite/display=default/ ) also has a prior label of "Schirmerite".

It's a very thin line between Sb-rich but Bi-dominant Gustavite (such as http://rruff.info/R100203 ), and Sb-dominant Terrywallaceite.

Schirmerite is also Bi-dominant, but has a thicker PbS sheet than Gustavite in the structure. A Sb-dominant phase would make a new species, I believe.

Lefteris.

23rd Oct 2011 17:52 UTCMarko Burkhardt Expert

Very interesting!

My sample has exacty the same label. If there is no mix-up of the labels, it is probably Terrywallaceite. An analysis will be helpfull, I guess.

Marko

25th Oct 2011 23:42 UTCRichard Gunter Expert

Hi

These "Schirmerite" crystals from Peru do not look too much like the type locality Schirmerite. The Schirmerite crystals are tin-white laths in Quartz that have a coating of a fine-grained, black alteration product. The Colorado Schirmerite crystals do not contain any Sb but have variable Bi-Pb ratios. I do not know why but it may be due to short-range disequilibrium.

Richard Gunter

26th Oct 2011 10:24 UTCLefteris Rantos Expert

All minerals of the Gustavite-Lillianite series (and several other bladed/acicular sulphosalts not strictly members of the series) are visually identical and can not be identified by sight. Comparing habits of such minerals from different locations can only mix up things worse.

Just take a look at specimens of Gustavite, Cosalite and Krupkaite that have been positively identified by the RRUFF project ( http://rruff.info/ ): most of them were labeled as something different on their previous labels!

Indeed, type-locality Schirmerite from Colorado looks completely different from the Peruvian material. However this doesn't mean that Schirmerite can not occur in a habit similar to other species of the Gustavite-Lillianite series (free-standing bladed xls) at a different locality. I'm not saying that this makes the Peruvian material true Schirmerite, just that it doesn't exclude this possibility.

Also, the formula of Schirmerite could probably incorporate some Sb replacing Bi, as long as Bi remains dominant (someone more knowledgeable of the complex mineralogy of sulphosalts might correct me here, as incorporation of Sb could at some extent change the structure?). So we could not exclude the existence of a Sb-bearing Schirmerite, even if type-locality material is actually Sb-free. Also, variable Pb/Bi ratios could result in different species (or a mixture of species): As noted before, the difference between Schirmerite and Gustavite (and several other closely related species, for that purpose) is the thickness of a PbS sheet in the structure, i.e. the Pb/Bi ratio.

Marko - an analysis would certainly shed light to the situation here. Everything else is mere guess at this point...

Lefteris.

26th Oct 2011 16:06 UTCRichard Gunter Expert

Hi Lefteris:

Your point about the Lillianite Group being difficult to identify and many minerals specimens existing under "false flags" is well taken.

The chemical analyses by Dr. Karup-Moller in his 1977 investigation of type Schirmerite gave three discrete clusters of analyses on a Bi2S3-Ag2S-Pb2S2 triangular plot. They plotted along a constant Ag2S tie line.

Part of the problem with the mislabelling may be the age of some of the samples. Schirmerite was originally characterized by Dr. Genth and his paper on the description indicates he had great difficulty distinguishing Schirmerite as all the data available to him was wet chemistry.

The Treasury Mine is fairly simple in its sulphosalt mineralogy. The Ag-Bi veins are physically separate from the Galena-bearing Pb-Ag veins. Schirmerite only occurs in the Ag-Bi veins.

Richard Gunter

24th Jun 2012 21:36 UTCMarko Burkhardt Expert

Analysis was made.

Results:

Pb: 10,8%

S: 51,3%

Sb: 8%

Bi: 23,8%

Th: 6% (Th???)

(Could the Th peak being mistaken? Is it a Ag peak?)

Can anybody tell me what it might be?

Marko

24th Jun 2012 22:00 UTCRob Woodside 🌟 Manager

Finally A thorium Sulphosalt!!!:-S

25th Jun 2012 17:41 UTCLefteris Rantos Expert

I believe we can safely assume that the Th is a misinterpretation... But I can't help much here, as I have no idea on the interpretation of EDS (?) results. Ag seems possible though, as it should be expected here.

What we can also safely assume, is that your specimen is indeed strongly Bi-dominant, i.e. Schirmerite or Gustavite, and NOT Terrywallaceite or some other new Sb-dominant species.

Lefteris.

25th Jun 2012 18:49 UTCPeter Haas

I agree that the material is bismuth-rich, but it is not strongly so (Keep in mind that the atomic weight of bismuth is almost twice that of antimony), and there is faaaaar too much sulfur in this analysis:

Sb: 121.76 g/mol

Bi: 208.98 g/mol

Pb: 207.2 g/mol

Ag: 107.87 g/mol

S. 32.06 g/mol

Thus we get:

Bi : Sb : Pb : Ag : S = 0.114: 0.066 : 0.052 : 0.056 : 1.600

29th Jun 2012 17:11 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

If these are EDS data you can't trust the Pb:Bi:S ratio (too many peak overlaps).

3rd Jul 2012 13:03 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

Marko send me the EDS spectrum. The "Th" peaks are clearly Ag peaks.

Identification is impossible without XRD analysis or at least quant. EPMA.

Go to top of page